MrWizard's Ramblings

I have somewhat of a glut of samples. Some are great some not so much. I’ll be rapidly reviewing some of them with to get it out of the way.

Glenrothes Reserve Sample Pack
Bourbon Cask Reserve
Bottle notes: Coconut and vanilla, rich and sweet.
My notes: Malt and sweet, oak, and bits of bourbon spice. Pleasant.
Sherry Cask Reserve
Bottle notes: Spicy ginger, Orange peel. Sherry oak.
My notes: In line with bottle notes. Spicy ginger sherry
Vintage Reserve
Bottle notes: Mellow, light fruits, citrus and honey.
My notes: Somewhat in-between of the first two. More mellow than sherry, spicier than the bourbon cask. Arguably the most interesting of the three.
Overall
I wish Glenrothes didn’t bottle just about everything at low proof. These samples are 40%, yet still plenty malty and flavor forward. Their old vintage bottles are 43%. Hardly anything is over 48%. That being said, I paid $10 for the 3 pack. No regrets, expectations met. Solid, drinkable, makes for a good present/intro into main scotch styles.
Score: B-

Widow Jane 12 Single Barrel 99 proof(MGP)
Overall
A solid MGP pick with nothing outstanding but nothing missing. Baking spices and wood in balance with MGP vanilla sweetness. Possibly too much wood as it becomes little bitter with oxygen. As a package, this is somewhat similar to K&L’s SAOS, reviewed here: https://www.aerin.or … y:entry200729-002755. Solid bourbon, way above the average, bordering on great.
Score: B+

Jack Daniel’s Single Barrel Barrel Proof #18-8295; 128.9 proof
Overall
Fire! lots of fire, wood and spices. Boy this thing is alcohol forward! Then come tons and tons of wood and spice and sugar. It’s tasty but really alcohol forward and doesn’t make me reach for more than one pour by itself. Mostly a mix of generic bourbon flavors in this one. Nothing bad, nothing outstanding. If anything its almost better to be used to proof something up or on the rocks to cut that alcohol. Lovers of fiery Elijah Craig Barrel Proof releases will find this quite up their alley though. I’m glad I’ve tried it to cover tasting/distillery bases. Cheap Jack is not my cup of whiskey, but their barrel proof releases are reasonably drinkable, but I’m not going to be missing this particular profile. Is it drinkable? Yes. Is it one to instantly buy in the store? Not particularly. As a side note, with bourbon prices rising sharply this could be one of the few semi-available barrel proofs in its particular price bracket and of course with each bottle being a single cask your mileage may vary on the flavor and alcohol balance notes.
Score: B-

Scoring Breakdown: https://www.aerin.or … age=scores_breakdown

Old Ezra 7 Barrel Strength, 117 proof
https://www.klwines.com/p/i?i=1385038
Nose: Alcohol and rye forward. All the classic bourbon flavors are there as well as a bit of cherry on the nose combined with that sweet and spicy profile. Quite pleasant and enjoyable to sniff at.
Palate: Wood and rye profile. Extremely concentrated and rye forward. Notably, not overly sweet as opposed to the nose, and not much cherry. Wood is strong in this one and it’s a little tannic/bitter. I think it can benefit from small splash of water.
Aftertaste: Wood, wood and more wood that eventually fades into spice numbness. Quite long and reasonably good one for folk that look for those wood notes. No particularly bad flavors in the back and this particular balance certainly has its appeal.
Overall: Well this is a spice and wood bomb which is arguably more concentrated on flavor than its 117 proof suggests. To me, the balance is way out of proportion and leans too much towards wooden tannins. Certainly enjoyable, though I’d recommend having this on the rocks. The upsides of this being a high proof and age-stated have been noted but I’m struggling to see it as my daily drinker, though someone else certainly can claim it as such. Certainly worth trying a glass if possible out there, before making a bottle commitment. I wouldn’t recommend chasing it down if other things are available or for some sort of premium price.
Score: B-

Old Forester 1920 Prohibition Style, 115 proof
https://www.klwines.com/p/i?i=1281033
Nose: Cherries all over on the nose. It smells like an alcoholic cherry jam of sorts. Some may find it a bit too much but this brings childhood memories for me so I’m ‘cool cool cool’ with it (not the alcohol part, jeez, the cherry jam).
Palate: Typical sweeter bourbon profile, as opposed to the rye spice, is on display here, yet again with cherries having a ball. The balance is excellent, though the sugar actually is on the losing side from the wood, spice and alcohol, very enjoyable if somewhat proof-forward. It certainly is sweet, the corn content makes sure of it, but the other flavors win over the sweetness.
Aftertaste: Medium length and quite pleasant. More of the same from the palate on the interplay of balances with yet again, sugar being on the losing side. Wood, spice, alcohol, cherries. Like eating a bit of sugarless cherry jam, with booze.
Overall: This is a dependable, solid, daily drinker with no frills and barely any downsides. Slightly dry in terms of sugars is about the only minor gripe for me. An excellent, but not outstanding, bourbon that leans towards cherry profile. For now, readily available in stores and worth having.
Score: B

Scoring Breakdown: https://www.aerin.or … age=scores_breakdown

I’ve been slacking last week on the reviewing part, so may as well not wait any longer and review more samples

Whistlepig 10 ‘Original Wine Club Pick’ Single Barrel 112 proof
Nose: Oh you, sweet vanilla front and center here. Very perfume-forward.
Palate: Ethereal vanilla that drinks much higher than its proof. Really, it drinks like a 125+ for being a 112 proof. Nearly no body. Little bits of wood but the alcohol overwhelms. Water helps here to tune the alcohol burn down, after which it becomes a wood/spice/vanilla mess.
Aftertaste: Alcohol burn with some wood and vanilla sweetness. Less burn after water. Very slight rye and eucalyptus in the very back. Very long aftertaste that is likely its saving grace. I want that aftertaste, yet I dread drinking more to extend it.
Overall: This is a hot mess. I find myself struggling to give it a passing grade after having done work to make it drinkable. Honestly, I’m struggling to see rye notes in the glass at all. If I was tasting it blindly, I’d be convinced this is some kind of bourbon. Becomes reasonably drinkable with water, essentially not palatable at bottle proof. The aftertaste is actually quite good, but it’s a journey I’d rather not take to get there. Side Note, the sample I was given was my first experience with Whistlepig. I’m aware they produce/bottle highly-regarded delicious bottlings, but this wasn’t one of them for me.
Score: D+

Few Rye ‘Total Wine Pick Single Barrel’ 101 proof
Nose: Chocolate and rye bread on the nose. With a tiny bit of eucalyptus of course, it wouldn’t be a rye without that for the most part.
Palate: Very rye bread-like on the palate. Sweet and quite complex to unwrangle. Wood is well balanced together with spice and vanilla flavors and doesn’t lose in its intensity. The closest thing I can come up with on similarity would be a well roasted, freshly baked rye bread crust. Maybe with a small touch of caraway seeds.
Aftertaste: Same as palate without major changes or deviations and lasts a reasonable amount of time. Again, a lot like eating fresh rye bread in my childhood. Maybe a touch of soap somewhere in the very end, which is something that I’d expect with this type of rye profile and it works fine for the most part.
Overall: Well, this one takes me right back to my childhood of… eating freshly baked rye bread. Its tasty, reasonably straightforward and neither has any major faults nor generally outstanding in some way. Extremely drinkable and quite delicious nonetheless. Definitely enjoyable straight, but also will not call you back after moving on to something else.
Score: B
—
Scoring Breakdown: https://www.aerin.or … age=scores_breakdown

Another day, another review in the works. So many things that have not been reviewed on my shelves and I need to get through them. Such is my hard knock life.
Rye whiskey is not historically my forte. I’ve been enjoying single malt scotch for years, recently got into bourbons and been getting a solid exposure to those, but rye whiskey… it’s a mystery still that I’m working to peek in-between the curtains. My palate isn’t that great for it so I’ll be mostly working on the basis whether I like it or not.

Scoring Breakdown: https://www.aerin.or … age=scores_breakdown

Knob Creek Rye Single Barrel Hi-Time Store Pick 114.4 proof
(Mash unknown)
Nose: Beam characteristics shine through. Strong cinnamon and baking spices interplay here.
Palate: More Beam (Knob Creek) character shining through here. Much better balance between cinnamon and baking spices when compared to their bourbon for example. Woody but not overwhelmingly so and it meshes well with the rest of the palate.
Aftertaste: More of the typical Knob/Booker’s fare here: Cola, spices, and wood galore rolling downhill in a big beautiful ball of flavor. Great stuff.
Overall: Fantastic, but may be too much of the same thing with the beam character. It’s basically more rye-forward knob creek/bookers. If you like those, you’ll like this one. If I didn’t know its a rye, I’d say it’s some sort of Booker’s batch.
Score: B+

Willett Small Batch Rye 107.6 proof
(Straight Rye)
Nose: Extremely pleasant and complex. Some sort of red fruit compote is going on in there.
Palate: This one starts great. Sweet, complex, spicy, chocolatey, yet light. There’s so much going on inside the glass. With time more wood comes out and it may get a little too tannic for some.
Aftertaste: Continuation of the palate, but yet again, there’s something not quite pleasant here either, and I think those are wood tannins that finally win the battle and overwhelm the long-lasting aftertaste.
Overall: This one is a conundrum… On one hand it’s not punchy enough to be a great mixer, nor it is a treat for me on the aftertaste… So it straddles that neither territory. Great to try, but this batch isn’t a doorbuster. Probably lightest rye I have tried so far in terms of flavor complexity and concentration at that proof.
Score: B-

Willett Small Batch 126 proof (sample):
Adding this about a month later. I’ve tried the above Willett 107 side-by-side with a different batch that was 126 proof. While the sample I was given mostly drinks like a concentrated version of a 107 the balance is different and it’s much sweeter without alcohol overload. By their nature, the batches differ and my bottle has a different profile in comparison to 126. Still, most of the above comments apply, and it tastes like a generally pleasant american whiskey. Solid drink for the night and solid pickup at MSRP.
Score: B

Woodinville Straight Rye 90 proof
(Straight, 100% Rye)
Nose: Sadly, but not unexpectedly the weakest of the three here. Woodinville rye being proofed down is its downfall. Smells somewhat like a diluted fruit compote from the Willett glass but also reminds me of a glue/soap or maybe sanitizer smell, which is quite unfortunate. It’s not unpleasant by any means, but not exciting either.
Palate: Sweet and spicy with somewhat watery middle notes. Again, proof works against it here. Quite strong wood influence that’s noticeable, despite its youthful age.
Aftertaste: Wonderful spicy and rye-full finish that’s not overwhelming and about medium long. No real downsides and I’d be quite happy with this aftertaste in just about anything.
Overall: I really wish this was older and higher proof. With so many great rye whiskeys out there this is a widely available great mixer and somewhat functional neat drink, but it should not be anywhere near top priority to buy.
Score: C

(Unfair) Conclusions:
The Hi-Time single barrel pick is an overall winner here but it’s also an unfair comparison to the rest of the lineup here. One is a limited release small batch and the other one is widely available. Of the three, I’d mix the Woodinville, drink Knob Creek myself and share Willett with friends in a more casual setting where conversation complements and smoothes out alcohol imperfections.

MPG is one of the largest US distillers doing all sorts of spirits, from vodka to rye to bourbon. https://en.wikipedia … /wiki/MGP_of_Indiana. Today we’ll look at a trio of 5 year old single cask picks from their stock bottled under Smooth Ambler Old Scout label.

Scoring Breakdown: https://www.aerin.or … age=scores_breakdown

Smooth Ambler Old Scout K&L Pick #23786
https://www.klwines.com/p/i?i=1476110
Nose: Perfume, light wood and burnt sugar. The nose leans towards lighter cologne notes on this one. The usual slightly sour note that’s typical of bourbons is there in pleasant form. In this case… I’ll say plum jam with these bottles.
Taste: Light, sweet, woody, spicy, fading into savory. Really delicious and balanced to the razor’s edge of perfection. A slightly tannic bitterness sets in after some time in the glass that sticks around.
Aftertaste: Very much in-line with the palate flavors. Nothing overwhelms and all those flavors last for a while.
Overall: Fantastic, easy drinking. This is a well-concentrated bourbon that at the same time feels light and full of perfume. It is extremely balanced and enjoyable anytime.
Score: A-

Smooth Ambler Old Scout PlumpJack Pick
https://plumpjackwin … gth-high-rye-bourbon
Nose: Cologne and wood galore. Nosing it side by side with KnL’s sample… I’d almost describe the above as delicate and this one as bold. Less sugar, more wood and spice. Darker, more caramel forward, still some plum jam in there.
Taste: Tons of wood and leather, still sugar and spices of course, it wouldn’t be a bourbon otherwise. Still pleasant, but this one is much punchier in comparison, as expected from the nose. There’s much more wood on this one.
Aftertaste: Wood and spices; wood and spices. Long and pleasant… Very even across the entire time, nothing fades of overwhelms… of that wood and spice notes and toasted sugary caramel.
Overall: Another fantastic barrel pick. Both of these are great examples of high rye excellent stock picks. This one is woodier and has more cologne on the nose and mouth vs the K&L example while still maintaining most of the same base notes. The balance is quite different here and it focuses on different note dominance which is perfectly fine as it would fare quite well depending on the pairing, in the same way that different types of pinot pair up with different foods.
Score: A-

Final word:
It’s a TIE! Let’s be honest, these are fantastic. Both barrels are from the same MGP 5 year stock and yet they both have their own unique character. I initially gave both an A- score and then I kept on wondering on why give them a minus and honestly, I have no reasons to grade them so. Both are great. In many ways I judge bottles on whether or not I’d want to get another bottle of it and the answer here, I already did and that’s for me the highest compliment that I can provide. You may wonder, which one is better? Well the answer is ‘neither’… they’re both good in their own subtle way. PlumpJack pick has that heavy wood and spice punchiness that’s great with colder weather, campfires, BBQ and steaks. KnL pick is providing that razor’s edge of flavor balance that’s somewhat different experience that is also fantastic on its own and neither one is lacking in anything that I can judge against them. If these are the only two bourbons I’d get to drink ever again… I’d be mostly satisfied as neither have any flaws that I can detect.